USPTO serial 85729021
CARNAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRINGER, DANIEL
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CARNAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julie C. VanDerZanden
JULIE C VANDERZANDEN PENN FISHING TACKLE MFG COMPANY4201 6TH AVE SSEATTLE, WA 98108-1702UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Fishing rods; fishing tackle | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2014 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 28, 2014 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 10, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 7, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 4, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |