Drawing for SELF-DEFENSE DIET

USPTO serial 85729212

SELF-DEFENSE DIET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRAZIER, TAMARA G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SELF-DEFENSE DIET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian J. McGinnis

BRIAN J. MCGINNIS BARNES & THORNBURG LLP11 S MERIDIAN STINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-3506UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Pre-recorded videotapes, DVDs, and CDs featuring information on self-defense, crime prevention and crime reduction, and personal growthACTIVE—
016Printed instructional and teaching materials in the nature of books, pamphlets, and newsletters on the topic of self-defense, crime prevention and crime reduction, and personal growthACTIVE—
035Providing a searchable website featuring the goods and services of other vendors relating to crime prevention, crime reduction, personal growth and self-defenseACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, conducting workshops and lectures in the field of self-defense, crime prevention and crime reduction, and personal growthACTIVE—
045Providing information in the field of crime prevention, crime reduction, personal growth and self-defense; providing a website featuring information in the fields of crime prevention, crime reduction, personal growth and self-defenseACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 10, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 10, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 13, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2016EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 1, 2016EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 1, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 3, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 2, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 25, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 26, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 26, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 3, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 2, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 1, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 24, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 24, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 4, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 2, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 16, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 16, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 29, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 27, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 27, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 4, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 7, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 18, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 1, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 26, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 26, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 26, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 17, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 16, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 16, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 16, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2013ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 17, 2013PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Mar 7, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 6, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 22, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 3, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 22, 2013GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 22, 2013GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 22, 2013CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 11, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 19, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance