Drawing for CRIMEREWARDS

USPTO serial 85729413

CRIMEREWARDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRIMEREWARDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John A. Thomas

John A. Thomas Glast, Phillips & Murray, P.C.14801 Quorum Drive, Suite 500Dallas, TX 75254UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Conversion of data from physical to electronic media; cross-platform conversion of digital content into other forms of digital content; forensic analysis of surveillance video for forensic research purposesACTIVE—
045Security consultancy with respect to theft and related crimes; providing intelligence and information to local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies related to crime; compiling crime occurrence data; identification verification services, namely, providing authentication of personal identification information; providing a website featuring information in the field of private investigation of personsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 5, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 17, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 14, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 20, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 20, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 5, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 4, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 4, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 27, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 27, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 23, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 13, 2015CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2015COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 10, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 20, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 17, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 24, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 24, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 26, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 26, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2014NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 4, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 12, 2014NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 29, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 29, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 8, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 7, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 7, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 6, 2013CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 5, 2013CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 15, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 15, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 20, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 19, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance