USPTO serial 85730674
SEER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SEER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael Martensen
MICHAEL MARTENSEN MARTENSEN IP30 E KIOWA ST STE 101COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80903-1510UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management; business administration; providing office functions; business process management; business project management services; database management; business management consultation in the field of database management; business consultancy relating to the administration of information technology; electronic data processing services; computer data processing services; compiling of information into computer databases; data processing relating to complex event processing and complex event information and knowledge management; information, advisory and consulting services relating to the aforesaid services; compilation of information into databases relating to information systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services and research and design relating thereto, namely, consulting services in the field of information gathering, data management, content acquisition, multilingual semantic analysis, and mining the relevant information from disparate data sources; design and development of computer software; computer programming; computer consultancy services; technical consulting and advisory services related to computer software; maintenance and updating of computer software; computer software technical support services; computer and information technology consultancy services; computer project management; maintaining, and modernizing computer software; compilation of information relating to information systems; services for the updating of information on computers; data mining; computer systems analysis; design and development of computer databases; technical data analysis services; data mining and computerized data analysis relating to complex event processing and complex event information and knowledge management; information, advisory and consulting services relating to the aforesaid services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Intelligent Software Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Intelligent Software Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SEER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 6, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 31, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 21, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 11, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 2, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 7, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 17, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 14, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2012 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |