USPTO serial 85731323
NOURISH YOUR EVOLUTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NOURISH YOUR EVOLUTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Bernardino, CA
San Bernardino, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julia Anne Matheson
JULIA ANNE MATHESON FINNEGAN HENDERSON ET AL901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4432UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Concentrates and syrups for making frozen, blended milk-based beverages; soy based food beverages used as a milk substitute; nut based milk | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Flavoring syrups; flavoring syrup for tea and herbal tea-based beverages; concentrates and syrups for making frozen, blended tea-based beverages; syrups for making tea-flavored drinks | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Fruit juices; fruit and fruit juice based beverages; fruit drinks and soft drinks containing fruit juices; frozen fruit beverages and frozen fruit-based beverages; fruit concentrates and purees used as ingredients of beverages; concentrates and syrups for making frozen, blended fruit beverages; concentrates and syrups for making frozen, blended soft-drink beverages; concentrates and syrups for making frozen, blended fruit-drink beverages; sparkling fruit and fruit juice based beverages and soda beverages; vegetable-fruit juices; vegetable-based beverages; beverages containing vegetable juices, namely, vegetable juice beverages; liquid and powdered beverage mixes for making soft drinks and fruit based beverages; syrups for making tea and herbal tea-based beverages; drinking water, spring water, mineral water, sparkling water, drinking water with vitamins; soft drinks; soda pop beverages; syrups for making fruit-flavored drinks; flavored and unflavored bottled waters; energy drinks; soy-based beverages not being milk substitutes; nut juice beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Restaurant, cafe, cafeteria, snack bar, carry out restaurants, take out restaurants; catering services; contract catering services; food preparation; carry out restaurant services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Evolution Fresh, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Evolution Fresh, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named NOURISH YOUR EVOLUTION
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 30, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 8, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 11, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 22, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 2, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 1, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 15, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |