Drawing for FREEDOM TO FOCUS

USPTO serial 85732204

FREEDOM TO FOCUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WATTS-FITZGERALD, CAITLIN C
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with FREEDOM TO FOCUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicole M. Deforge

NICOLE M DEFORGE VAN COTT BAGLEY CORNWALL & MCCARTHY PC36 S STATE STSTE 1900SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-1478

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing a website featuring non-downloadable software for electronic workflow management processing for use in the alternative asset industry, which software enables tracking, storage, transmittal, review, and execution of subscription documents, and facilitates marketing and client communicationsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 12, 2013MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 12, 2013ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 12, 2013OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 12, 2013OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Apr 30, 2013OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 22, 2013ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 6, 2013NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 24, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 23, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 8, 2013CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 8, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 8, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 3, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance