Drawing for INVU

USPTO serial 85733435

INVU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INVU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christina D. Yates

CHRISTINA D. YATES DLA PIPER LLP (US)401 B ST STE 1700SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-4297UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036real estate agency and real estate brokerage servicesACTIVE—
037real estate development services; land development services, namely, planning and laying out of residential and/or commercial communities; commercial building and residential construction services, building construction repair; construction planningACTIVE—
041entertainment, namely, live performances by a musical band; art exhibitions; night clubs; health club services, namely, providing instruction and equipment in the field of physical exercise; amusement arcades; beach and pool clubs, namely, providing fitness and exercise facilities featuring pools and bathing and showering facilities; arranging and conducting seminars in the field of professional educationACTIVE—
043restaurant and bar services, café services; cafeteria services; cocktail lounges services; snack bar services; hotel services; catering; provision of convention, conference, exhibition and meeting facilitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 17, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 16, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 14, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 19, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 30, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 15, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 15, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 12, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2015ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 26, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 25, 2015ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 9, 2015PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
May 26, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 20, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 29, 2015RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 29, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 23, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 23, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 20, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 19, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 19, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 18, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 15, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 24, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance