Drawing for BODY ARMOUR

USPTO serial 85734262

BODY ARMOUR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLLOPY, DIANE PATRICIA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BODY ARMOUR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lindsey Rothrock

Lindsey Rothrock Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff LLPOne American SquareSuite 2300Indianapolis, IN 46282

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Application of protective coatingsACTIVEOct 22, 2014

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 15, 2017ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 28, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 28, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 30, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 26, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 26, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 26, 2015CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 1, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 27, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 27, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 18, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 13, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 13, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2015CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2015ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 7, 2015PBSRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - SENIOR ATTORNEY REQUEST—
Feb 7, 2015CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Nov 13, 2014SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 13, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 22, 2014IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 22, 2014EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Oct 18, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 16, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 16, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 24, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 22, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 22, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 29, 2013CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Oct 22, 2013APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Oct 22, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 18, 2013EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2013ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Mar 28, 2013ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 6, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 17, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 25, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance