USPTO serial 85734895
GREASE BUSTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JUN, WON KYUNG WENDY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GREASE BUSTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Olds, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce M. Green
BRUCE M. GREEN OYEN WIGGS GREEN & MUTALA LLP601 WEST CORDOVA STREETSUITE 480 THE STATIONVANCOUVER, BC, V6B1G1Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | non-bacterial carbohydrate composition for treatment of grease traps and sewer lines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 26, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 28, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 28, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 5, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 28, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 13, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 10, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |