Drawing for EED

USPTO serial 85734996

EED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical apparatus, namely, dispensers for medical fluid injectorsACTIVE—
035Retail services, namely, online ordering services and online store services in the area of dispensers for medical fluid injectors for public and commercial buildingsACTIVE—
037Maintenance and refurbishing of dispensers for medical fluid injectors in public and commercial buildingsACTIVE—
044Charitable services, namely, providing medical equipment in the nature of dispensers for medical fluid injectors to public and commercial buildings in need of such devices; Leasing of medical equipment in the nature of dispensers for medical fluid injectors to public and commercial buildingsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 4, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 4, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 27, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 26, 2015EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 11, 2015EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 11, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 4, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 30, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 30, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 12, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 11, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 27, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 27, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 27, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 21, 2014CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 21, 2014COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 21, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 21, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 25, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 25, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 25, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 4, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 9, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 9, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 20, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 5, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 21, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 21, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 13, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 13, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 25, 2013GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 25, 2013GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 25, 2013CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 19, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 25, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance