USPTO serial 85735193
MDM360
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MDM360?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fiberlink Communications Corporation
Blue Bell, PA
Other trademarks owned by Fiberlink Communications Corporation
Fiberlink Communications Corporation
Blue Bell, PA
Other trademarks owned by Fiberlink Communications Corporation
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
ARMONK, NY
Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leonora Hoicka
Leonora Hoicka International Business Machines CorpNorth Castle DriveIntellectual Property - TrademarksArmonk, NY 10504Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE FOR USE TO MANAGE, ADMINISTER, MODIFY, CONTROL, AND REPORT THE STATUS OF END-USER MOBILE COMPUTERS, LAPTOPS, NOTEBOOKS, SMARTPHONES, TABLETS, AND PDAS, NAMELY, TO MONITOR END USER DATA, AND END USER SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS RUNNING ON THE END-USER MOBILE COMPUTERS, LAPTOPS, NOTEBOOKS, SMARTPHONES, TABLETS, AND PDAS CONNECTING REMOTELY TO LOCAL AREA NETWORKS ALL FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONTROLLING SECURE ACCESS TO THE LOCAL AREA NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | PROVIDING MANAGED REMOTE INTERNET ACCESS SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING SECURE, GENERAL-PURPOSE CONNECTIVITY SO THAT COMPUTER SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS AND COMPUTER NETWORK-BASED SERVICES, FILE SHARING SERVICES, E-MAIL SERVICES, AND INTRANET SERVICES CAN BE SECURELY ACCESSED BY A USER CONNECTING REMOTELY TO THE ENTERPRISE LOCAL AREA NETWORK WITH END-USER MOBILE COMPUTERS, LAPTOPS, NOTEBOOKS, SMARTPHONES, TABLETS, AND PDAS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | PROVIDING A WEB-BASED SYSTEM, AN ONLINE PORTAL, AND PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF NON-DOWLOADABLE COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS TO MANAGE, ADMINISTER, MODIFY, AND CONTROL THEIR END-USER MOBILE COMPUTERS, LAPTOPS, NOTEBOOKS, SMARTPHONES, TABLETS, AND PDAS, THEIR END USER DATA, AND THEIR END USER SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS RUNNING ON THE END-USER MOBILE COMPUTERS, LAPTOPS, NOTEBOOKS, SMARTPHONES, TABLETS, AND PDAS CONNECTING REMOTELY TO LOCAL AREA NETWORKS ALL FOR THE PURPOSE OF COMPUTER SECURITY, NAMELY, RESTRICTING ACCESS TO AND BY COMPUTER NETWORKS TO AND OF UNDESIRED WEB SITES, MEDIA AND INDIVIDUALS AND FACILITIES; HOSTING COMPUTER APPLICATION SOFTWARE ON A COMPUTER SERVER FOR OTHERS TO MANAGE, ADMINISTER, MODIFY, CONTROL, AND REPORT THE STATUS OF THEIR END-USER MOBILE COMPUTERS, LAPTOPS, NOTEBOOKS, SMARTPHONES, TABLETS, AND PDAS, THEIR END USER DATA, AND THEIR END USER SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS RUNNING ON THE END-USER MOBILE COMPUTERS, LAPTOPS, NOTEBOOKS, SMARTPHONES, TABLETS, AND PDAS CONNECTING REMOTELY TO LOCAL AREA NETWORKS, ALL FOR USE IN CONTROLLING SECURE ACCESS TO THE LOCAL AREA NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fiberlink Communications Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Fiberlink Communications Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MDM360
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 21, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 15, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2015 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 24, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 4, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 13, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 13, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 12, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 10, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 27, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 27, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 17, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 16, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |