USPTO serial 85735722
CITIZENSHIP SCHOOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4366232Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 9, 2013
- Examiner
- KEAM, ALEX S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CITIZENSHIP SCHOOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Hochman
DAVID HOCHMAN WOLF, RIFKIN, SHAPIRO, SCHULMAN & RABKIN, LLP11400 W OLYMPIC BLVD FL 9LOS ANGELES, CA 90064-1582UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | AUDIOVISUAL AND ELECTRONIC INSTRUCTIONAL AND EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS, NAMELY, WEB SITES FEATURING NON-DOWNLOADABLE INTERACTIVE VIDEOS AND NON-DOWNLOADABLE MANUALS, WORKBOOKS, BOOKS, BROCHURES, PAMPHLETS, AND HANDOUTS USED FOR THE TEACHING OF CITIZENSHIP SKILLS AND KNOWLEDGE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 24, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2024 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 9, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2019 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2019 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 28, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 20, 2019 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 5, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 29, 2013 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 29, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 29, 2013 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2013 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 28, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2013 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 16, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 15, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2013 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 24, 2013 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 24, 2013 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 18, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |