Drawing for ALL BRIGHT

USPTO serial 85738023

ALL BRIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
COLEMAN, NICHOLAS A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALL BRIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Adam R. Bialek, Esq.

ADAM R. BIALEK, ESQ. Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Electric, decorative string lights used in connection with holidays, namely, Christmas, Halloween, Valentine's Day, St. Patrick's Day, Easter, and July 4thACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 10, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 28, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 27, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jan 8, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jan 8, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 22, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 21, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jul 15, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jun 19, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jun 19, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 4, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Dec 2, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Dec 2, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 2, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 9, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 14, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
May 14, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 24, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Apr 5, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 3, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 18, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 13, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 13, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 13, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 13, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 24, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 28, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 28, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance