Drawing for PROGRESSIVE FOAM

USPTO serial 85738666

PROGRESSIVE FOAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROGRESSIVE FOAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard M. Klein

RICHARD M KLEIN FAY SHARPE LLPTHE HALLE BUILDING 1228 EUCLID AVE5TH FLOORCLEVELAND, OH 44115-1834

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017construction materials, namely, exterior building insulation made of polystyrene, expanded polystyrene, or other foamed thermoplastic, shaped to conform with other building products such as siding, roofing, decking, or fencingACTIVEMar 13, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 15, 2014MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 12, 2014ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 12, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 25, 2014EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 20, 2014RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Jul 30, 2014GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 30, 2014GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 30, 2014CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jun 10, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 13, 2013GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Dec 13, 2013GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Dec 13, 2013CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Nov 25, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 25, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 22, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 22, 2013EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 24, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 24, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 24, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 2, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 2, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 22, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 22, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 1, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance