USPTO serial 85739228
BRAND VISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4677176Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 27, 2015
- Examiner
- JACKSON, ELIZABETH FLEMING
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BRAND VISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laurel V. Dineff
LAUREL V. DINEFF DINEFF TRADEMARK LAW LIMITED160 N WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606-1633UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Common metals and their alloys including stainless steel; Door frames of metal; Door panels of metal; Door stops of metal; Doors of metal; Loading and unloading pallets of metal; Metal bolts; Metal building flashing; Metal building material, namely, fascia; Metal building materials, namely, ceiling boards and floor boards; Metal building materials, namely, soffits; Metal door latches; Metal knockers; Metal profiles made of steel, iron, nickel, titanium and other metals and their alloys; Metal slings for loading; Non-electric door chimes; Prefabricated buildings made substantially of metal; Prefabricated metal platforms; Straps of metal for handling loads | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Electric strikes for remote control of door ingress and egress; Electronic door alarms; Electronically-operated door latches; Security products, namely, entry door systems comprising touch pads and security doors | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | Automated security gates not of metal; Door casings, not of metal; Non-metal building materials, namely, for security; Non-metal building products, namely, shutters, shingles, siding, and trim; Non-metal ceiling panels; Non-metal door frames; Non-metal door panels; Non-metal doors; Non-metal fence panels; Non-metal floor panels; Non-metal window frames; Plastic security windows allowing communication; Prefabricated non-metal buildings; Window casings, not of metal | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Amiserru, S.L.
- Other trademarks owned by Amiserru, S.L.
- Other trademarks owned by Amiserru, S.L.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named BRAND VISION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 27, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 11, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 8, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 27, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |