Drawing for ROYAL

USPTO serial 85740666

ROYAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILLES, DEBORAH LYNN MEINERS
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ROYAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven J. Nataupsky

Steven J. Nataupsky Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP2040 Main Street, 14th FloorIrvine, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Regular and organic canned lentils and beansACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 15, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 2, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2019CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2019SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 7, 2019IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 7, 2019EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Feb 22, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2019EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 20, 2019EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 20, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 25, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 23, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 23, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 24, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 22, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 22, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 25, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 23, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 23, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 28, 2017NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 24, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 2, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 23, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 23, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 23, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 28, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 8, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 25, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 23, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 19, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 19, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 19, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 19, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 7, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2015ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 10, 2015PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Oct 24, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 19, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 9, 2015RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 9, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 14, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 14, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 7, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 7, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 23, 2013CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2013COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 5, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 5, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 5, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 3, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 16, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 24, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 24, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 3, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance