USPTO serial 85740728
ROBOT DRAGONFLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4420034Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 15, 2013
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROBOT DRAGONFLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason R. Lee
KELLY O WALLACE WELLBORN WALLACE & WOODARD LLP1175 PEACHTREE STREET NE100 COLONY SQUARE SUITE 300ATLANTA, GA 30361Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Robotic systems consisting essentially of robots and remote controls therefor, all for personal and hobby use | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Nov 6, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TechJect Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by TechJect Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Jayant Ratti
- Other trademarks owned by Jayant Ratti
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ROBOT DRAGONFLY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2016 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 6, 2014 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - CERTIFICATE OF REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 7, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2014 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 6, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 2, 2013 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2013 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 23, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |