USPTO serial 85740731
#LIPTOLIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with #LIPTOLIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Louisville, KY
Louisville, KY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David W. Carrithers
DAVID W. CARRITHERS CARRITHERS LAW OFFICE PLLC120 W. Stephen Foster Ave, Suite 101Bardstown, KY 40004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Paper goods and printed matter, namely, calendars, bumper stickers, posters, pictures, sketches, art prints, decals, paper signs, greeting cards, poster art, paper cups, and stickers | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, caps, polo shirts, sweaters, t-shirts, sweat shirts, jackets, jeans, ponchos, boxers, jackets, hats, caps, headbands, sleepwear, writs bands, swimsuits, swimsuit coverups, and warm up suits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 20, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 18, 2014 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 21, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 15, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 14, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 4, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |