Drawing for COGNIGRAM

USPTO serial 85741547

COGNIGRAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PARK, JENNY K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COGNIGRAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karen Wetherell Davis

KAREN WETHERELL DAVIS ELLIOTT, OSTRANDER & PRESTON, P.C.707 SW WASHINGTON ST STE 1500PORTLAND, OR 97205-3532UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Web-based service for assessing and monitoring cognition, namely, computer services in the nature of an interactive website featuring technology that allows users to assess and monitor cognition for purposes of obtaining treatment or of making decisions regarding physical activitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 12, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 12, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 18, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 17, 2016EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 20, 2016EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 20, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 5, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 4, 2015EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 27, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 11, 2015EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 11, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 7, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 10, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 10, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 12, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 9, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 21, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 21, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 16, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 14, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 14, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 6, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 11, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 22, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 4, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 4, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 25, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 25, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 31, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 4, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance