USPTO serial 85741601
SUGAR BROOK FARMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NUNLEY, CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUGAR BROOK FARMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Erik W. Ibele
ERIK W. IBELE NEIDER & BOUCHER, S.C.401 CHARMANY DR STE 310MADISON, WI 53719-1270UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Cheese; cheese spreads; cheese spreads in the form of cheese balls; cold pack cheese; cheese spreads in the form of deli cakes; meats; processed meats; packaged meats; snack foods, namely, meat-based snack foods, and vegetable based snack foods; and processed fruits and vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Cheese flavored snacks, namely, puffed cheese balls; snack foods, namely, corn-based snack foods, cereal-based snack foods; seasonings; dipping sauces; cheese sauce; hot sauce; tartar sauce; horseradish; salad dressing; mustard; and barbecue sauce | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Family Fresh Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Family Fresh Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named SUGAR BROOK FARMS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 10, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 6, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 12, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 22, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 18, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |