Drawing for HIP HOP YOGA

USPTO serial 85743907

HIP HOP YOGA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEIPZIG, MARC J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HIP HOP YOGA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel J. Holmander

CHERYL A CLARKIN BARLOW JOSEPHS & HOLMES LTD101 DYER STFL 5PROVIDENCE, RI 02903-3926

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Yoga instructionACTIVEMar 1, 2008

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 8, 2015MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 8, 2015ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 8, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 27, 2015EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 3, 2014GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2014GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2014CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 9, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 9, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 30, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 30, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 30, 2014EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 30, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 30, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 30, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 25, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 25, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 25, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 30, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 31, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 9, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance