USPTO serial 85744051
EXOMEDIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- I, DAVID C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXOMEDIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Diane J. Mason
DIANE J. MASON LECLAIRRYAN LLP44 MONTGOMERY ST FL 18SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-4705UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing an on-line computer web site that provides commercial financial transaction data, account management, financial reporting, accounting features and related reference information; business services offered to video delivery industry, namely, advisory services and consultancy with regard to business planning, business analysis, business management, marketing and customer analysis | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Electronic transmission and streaming of digital media content for others via global and local computer networks; Mobile media services in the nature of electronic transmission of entertainment media content; Broadcasting of video and audio programming over the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Mobile media services in the nature of storage of entertainment media content; Providing a web site for the electronic storage of video content; Storage services for archiving databases, images and other electronic data | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Remote video transcoding services, namely, providing a website that features software that enables users to convert video files from one format to another format for the purpose of editing, processing, packaging, viewing on the web and streaming to IP-connected devices, including televisions, smartphones and tablets; Video broadcast management services, namely, providing a website that features technology that enables users to remotely operate their on-premise transcoding network, configure and backup their transcoding settings, templates, networks and workflow, synchronize transcoding settings across different deployed on-premise systems, and monitor metrics and analytics pertaining to video processing, via dashboards and reports; Cloud-computing services that feature software that enables users to convert video files from one format to another format for the purpose of editing, processing, packaging, viewing on the web and streaming to IP-connected devices, including televisions, smartphones and tablets; Computer services, namely, digital formatting and compression of music and video images into downloadable media; providing a web-based service featuring technology that enables users to manage the distribution of video and related digital content to user's customers, manage accounts, and provide user support; Providing on-line, non-downloadable, Internet-based software application for billing for video delivery providers; Back-up services for locally deployed media transcoding databases and application info, including but not limited to logs, settings and usage history | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Harmonic Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Harmonic Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EXOMEDIA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 23, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 19, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 24, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 4, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |