Drawing for 7 CAMICIE FRANCHISING NETWORK

USPTO serial 85744604

7 CAMICIE FRANCHISING NETWORK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VAGHANI, MAYUR C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 7 CAMICIE FRANCHISING NETWORK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joshua S. Jarvis, Esq.

JOSHUA S. JARVIS, ESQ. FOLEY HOAG LLP155 SEAPORT BLVD STE 1600BOSTON, MA 02210-2600UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Dresses, neckerchiefs, underwear, stockings, socks, short-sleeve shirts, hats, coats, belts, money belts, bathing suits, neckties, pocket squares, jackets, stuff jackets, skirts, singlets, sweaters, pants, trousers, pajamas, pullovers, shoes, sashes, underpants, t-shirtsACTIVE—
035Business management and consultation in the field of apparel and apparel sales; franchising, namely, consultation and assistance in business management, organization and promotion in the field of apparel and apparel salesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 18, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 11, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2015EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 9, 2015EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 9, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 11, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2015EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 9, 2015EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 9, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 11, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 9, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 9, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 11, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 9, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 9, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 16, 2014NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2014DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 11, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 11, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 9, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 9, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 6, 2013DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2013ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 16, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 27, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 12, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 11, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 4, 2013CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Feb 1, 2013GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2013GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2013EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Feb 1, 2013CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Feb 1, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 1, 2013GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2013GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2013CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jan 31, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 11, 2012MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Oct 10, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance