Drawing for HOME DESIGNS

USPTO serial 85745335

HOME DESIGNS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOME DESIGNS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Corrigan

MICHAEL J. CORRIGAN SUNBEAM PRODUCTS, INC.2381 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DRBOCA RATON, FL 33431-8560UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electric kitchen appliances, namely, food blenders, food processors, food choppers, juicers and juice extractors, hand-held food mixers, standing food mixers, blenders and hand-held food blendersACTIVE—
008Electric pressing irons and electric steam ironsACTIVE—
011Electric kitchen appliances, namely, electric skillets, griddles, indoor grills, waffle makers, sandwich makers, panini makers, deep fryers, slow cookers, coffee makers, kettles, rice cookers, food steamers, toasters, toaster ovens, contact grills and roastersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 23, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 23, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 19, 2013NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 24, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 4, 2013NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 21, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 19, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 15, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 14, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 14, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 14, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2013ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 16, 2013PBTQWITHDRAWN FROM PUB OTQR REQUEST—
Jul 9, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 8, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 17, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 14, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 13, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 18, 2012CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Dec 18, 2012EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Dec 18, 2012CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Dec 14, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 2012MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Oct 11, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance