USPTO serial 85745571
HELMUT LANG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HELMUT LANG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bret J. Danow
Bret J. Danow Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP575 Madison AvenueNew York, NY 10022-2585UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | LIP BALM, BODY LOTION, ROLL ON DEODORANT, BODY SPRAYS, SCENTED BODY SPRAYS, PERFUME EXTRACTS FOR TISSUES, BODY SPRAY USED AS A PERSONAL DEODORANT AND AS A FRAGRANCE, ROOM FRAGRANCES; SKIN CARE PRODUCTS FOR THE FACE, BODY, HANDS AND FEET, NAMELY, CLEANSING LOTION, CLEANSING BARS, CLEANSING CREAM, OIL-FREE CLEANSING LOTION, OIL-FREE CLEANSING BARS, OIL-FREE CLEANSING CREAM, CLEANSING MILK, ASTRINGENTS, TONER, TONING LOTIONS, FACIAL MASQUES, MAKE-UP REMOVAL CREAM, MAKEUP REMOVAL OIL, NIGHT CREAM, OIL-FREE MOISTURIZER, WATER-BASED MOISTURIZERS, FOUNDATION MOISTURIZERS, ANTI-AGING CREAM, ANTI-WRINKLE CREAM, ANTI-WRINKLE SERUM, ANTI-WRINKLE OIL, SUNBLOCK MOISTURIZER, SUNBLOCK CREAM, AFTER-SUN LOTION, SUNTANNING PREPARATIONS, SUNLESS TANNING LOTION AND SUNLESS TANNING SPRAY, SUNBURN CREAM, EXFOLIANTS FOR SKIN, FACIAL MASKS, BODY POWDERS AND SPRAYS, PERFUMES, DEODORANTS AND TOILET WATERS, BODY SPLASHES AND MOISTURIZING BODY MISTS, AFTER SHAVE LOTIONS, COSMETIC NAIL CARE PREPARATIONS NAMELY, NAIL ENAMEL, NAIL ENAMEL REMOVER, CUTICLE REMOVER, NAIL POLISH BASE COAT, NAIL DRYING PREPARATIONS, NAIL TOP COAT, AND NAIL SAVING PREPARATIONS IN THE NATURE OF A BONDING AGENT | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | CANDLES, SCENTED CANDLES AND PERFUMED CANDLES | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | EYEGLASSES, EYEGLASS FRAMES AND SUNGLASSES; PROTECTIVE COVERS FOR MOBILE PHONES, MP3 PLAYERS, AND OTHER PERSONAL COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATION DEVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | LEATHER DIARY AND ADDRESS BOOK COVERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | KEY CASES, LEATHER KEY CHAINS, TOTE BAGS, COSMETIC BAGS SOLD EMPTY, BACKPACKS, FANNY PACKS, ALL PURPOSE CARRYING BAGS, LUGGAGE, UMBRELLAS | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | HANDKERCHIEFS; TOWELS, NAMELY, FACE TOWELS, HAND TOWELS, BATH TOWELS, GOLF TOWELS, BEACH TOWELS, CHILDREN'S TOWELS, FOOTBALL TOWELS, KITCHEN TOWELS, LARGE BATH TOWELS, POOL TOWELS, TEA TOWELS, TERRY TOWELS, TURKISH TOWELS, TOWEL SETS; BED SHEETS, FITTED BED SHEETS, FLAT BED SHEETS, BED SHEET SETS, PILLOW CASES; BED SKIRTS, DUVETS, BED SHEETS AND PILLOW CASES SOLD AS A UNIT; PILLOW-TOP, LOW-PROFILE BED SKIRTS; COMFORTERS; DRAPERY; DUVET COVERS; HOUSEHOLD LINENS, NAMELY, MATTRESS COVERS AND PILLOW CASES; PILLOW COVERS; PILLOW SHAMS; TABLE LINENS, NAMELY, PLACEMATS, NAPKINS AND TOWELS; UNFITTED FABRIC FURNITURE COVERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Helmut Lang New York LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Helmut Lang New York LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named HELMUT LANG
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 2, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 7, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 24, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 14, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 5, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 6, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 12, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 26, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 29, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 9, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 17, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 29, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |