Drawing for HARBOR SHIELD

USPTO serial 85746501

HARBOR SHIELD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ULRICH, NANCY G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HARBOR SHIELD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL PAUL STANLEY

MICHAEL PAUL STANLEY NAVAL UNDERSEA WARFARE CENTER1176 HOWELL STNEWPORT, RI 02841-1703UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electric sensors; Electronic data relays for sensors; Electronic proximity sensors and switches; Environmental monitoring system comprised of meters and sensors that measure pressure, humidity, temperature and includes alarm and reporting functions; Microsensors for measurement of pressure, acceleration, force and flow, namely, silicon piezoresistive pressure sensors; Proximity sensors; Telecommunications equipment, namely, fiber-optic transceivers, fiber optic repeaters, converters and optimizers, wave division multiplexers, free-space optics transmission systems, switches including Ethernet switches and routers, fiber-to-the-home and ethernet-over-VDSL access aggregators, terminators and repeaters, and remote presence management products, namely, switches, and console, alarm, sensor and power management devices; Temperature sensors; Ultrasonic sensorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 22, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 22, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 18, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 24, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 24, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 4, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 18, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 29, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 29, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 8, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 8, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 10, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 12, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 11, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 9, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance