USPTO serial 85746655
PHILLIPS MEDISIZE PARTNERSHIPS BUILT ON INNOVATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 2, 2014
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PHILLIPS MEDISIZE PARTNERSHIPS BUILT ON INNOVATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
HUDSON, WI
HUDSON, WI
HUDSON, WI
HUDSON, WI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leah Feinman
Leah Feinman Koch Companies Public Sector, LLC4111 East 37th Street NorthWichita, KS 67220UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting services relating to product analysis in the fields of industrial design, mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, manufacturing, material science, performance testing, tooling design, quality assurance, and program management; business consultation services in the nature of identifying potential cost savings during the manufacturing process, modifying product designs, and/or exploring new branding strategies; consultation services, namely, business strategic planning consultation regarding product manufacturing, product design and product branding; distributorship of custom plastic and metal injection molded components; business consultation and management regarding product labeling | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Assembly of products for others; sterilization services in the fields of medical devices, drug delivery systems, medical equipment and consumer products; parts molding; custom manufacture of medical devices, drug delivery systems, medical equipment, military/defense equipment, consumer products, plastic parts, metal parts, ceramic parts, and parts of liquid silicone rubber to order and/or specification of others; prototype fabrication of new products for others; ceramic injection molding services; multi-shot injection molding services; tooling services, namely, injection molding and parts molding for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Design, development, and engineering services for medical devices, medical equipment, drug delivery systems, military/defense equipment and consumer products; design and testing for new product development; packaging design; product testing; product research and development; design of custom plastic and metal injection molded components; product development consultation; consultation services, namely, creative design consultation regarding the product manufacturing, product design and product branding; design, development, and consulting services related thereto in the field of new product development in the following industries, namely, appliance, aviation, computer/business equipment, durable consumer goods, electronics, industrial, lawn and garden, medical, military/defense, recreational, and telecommunications; tooling services, namely, tool design services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PHILLIPS-MEDISIZE, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by PHILLIPS PLASTICS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by PHILLIPS PLASTICS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by PHILLIPS PLASTICS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PHILLIPS MEDISIZE PARTNERSHIPS BUILT ON INNOVATION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 19, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 19, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 25, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 28, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 14, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 14, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 13, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 18, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 17, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 26, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 26, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Oct 13, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |