Drawing for INDIAN ACCENT

USPTO serial 85746748

INDIAN ACCENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INDIAN ACCENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Justin P. Welch

Justin P. Welch BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP2001 ROSS AVENUE2300 TRAMMELL CROW CENTERDALLAS, TX 75201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Restaurant franchising, namely, offering business management assistance in the establishment and/or operation of restaurants; Business consulting services relating to hotel and restaurantsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 8, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 8, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 27, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2016EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 4, 2016EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 4, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 13, 2015CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2015EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jun 23, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2015EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 2, 2015EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 2, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 2, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 2, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 2, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 2, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 23, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 2, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Sep 2, 2014PGEXPETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
Sep 2, 2014ERTPTEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2014PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Aug 19, 2014APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Aug 8, 2014PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2014MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 17, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 17, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 3, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 2, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 2, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 2, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 7, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 7, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 17, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2013PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Mar 4, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 4, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 19, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 18, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 17, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 17, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 7, 2013GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 7, 2013GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 7, 2013CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 4, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 9, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance