USPTO serial 85747127
TEAMVIEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TEAMVIEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel J. Long
DANIEL J. LONG BAE SYSTEMS65 SPIT BROOK RDNASHUA, NH 03060-6909UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | An immersive video system providing a 360 degree field of view, the system including visible light and infrared spectrum cameras, video and audio recording devices, a Global Positioning System locating device, and operator controls, all for use in national security applications | ACTIVE | Oct 22, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 3, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 6, 2012 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2012 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2012 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |