Drawing for HOTEL PARK CITY

USPTO serial 85749739

HOTEL PARK CITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 119

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOTEL PARK CITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Margaret Niver McGann

Margaret Niver McGann Parsons Behle & Latimer201 South Main Street, Suite 1800Salt Lake City, UT 84111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Resort hotel servicesACTIVEJan 15, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 31, 2015MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Mar 31, 2015ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 30, 2015EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 25, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2015RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 29, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 25, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 24, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 24, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 7, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 6, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 6, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 16, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance