USPTO serial 85750588
NORTH STAR PROVEN PERFORMANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NORTH STAR PROVEN PERFORMANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tara J. Anderson
TARA J. ANDERSON FAFINSKI MARK & JOHNSON, P.A.775 PRAIRIE CENTER DR STE 400EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344-7322UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Gasoline, diesel and motor-powered power tools and power operated equipment, namely, air compressors, wheel kits comprising steel axle rods for machines, fasteners for machines, plastic or rubber handle grips and lifting handles, pneumatic or solid rubber tires and steel support feet, portability kits comprising a mechanism to elevate one or more sides of a product such that the product becomes mobile and towing kits comprised primarily of steel axles for power operated equipment and also including automotive style wheels and tires, brake lights, trailer tongues and hitch coupler/safety chains as well as an assortment of nuts and bolts sold as a unit, the aforementioned kits being for generators for power operated equipment, stump grinders and power-operated asphalt sprayers, multi-purpose high-pressure washers, power-operated dry soda blasters, steam cleaning machines not for medical applications, power-operated sprayers, water pumps for water displacement, earth moving machines in the nature of backhoes, power-operated post hole diggers, trench cutters, power-operated lawn edgers, machines for splitting logs and for processing firewood, trowels, concrete saws, earth compacting machines, power-operated splitting wedges, engine mufflers, windmills, wind turbines, stump grinders for removal of tree stumps, asphalt repair equipment, namely, machines for seal coat application, machines for crack repair and machines for melting raw materials for crack repair; press brakes; shop presses, namely power-operated drill presses; power-operated chippers used for processing trees into wood chips, gasoline and diesel powered generators, and structural component parts for all of the foregoing | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Wheel kits for power operated equipment comprising pneumatic or solid rubber tires, steel support feet in the nature of foot pegs, steel axle rods for wheels, fasteners for wheels and plastic or rubber handle grips and lifting handles; towing kits for power operated equipment comprising automotive style wheels and tires, steel axles for trailers, brake lights, trailer tongues and hitch coupler/safety chains as well as an assortment of nuts and bolts sold as a unit | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Plastic pressurized foam dispensers for firefighting sold empty | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Northern Tool & Equipment Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Northern Tool & Equipment Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named NORTH STAR PROVEN PERFORMANCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 25, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 22, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 7, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 23, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 28, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 8, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 20, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2013 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 4, 2013 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 4, 2013 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 2, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |