Drawing for MEDUSE

USPTO serial 85751238

MEDUSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEARNEY, COLLEEN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEDUSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ara A. Babaian

Ara A. Babaian Encore Law Group9401 Wilshire BoulevardSuite 900Beverly Hills, CA 90212

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
034Hookah parts, namely, hoses, bowls, mouthpieces, bases, and funnels; Hookah tobacco; Hookahs; Smokers' articles, namely, hookah charcoalACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 17, 2013MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Sep 17, 2013ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 16, 2013EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 16, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 10, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 10, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 9, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 16, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance