USPTO serial 85751648
NUTRITEENS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MITTLER, ROBIN M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NUTRITEENS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy J. Szuhaj
TIMOTHY J SZUHAJ BECKER MEISEL LLC220 LAKE DR ESTE 102CHERRY HILL, NJ 08002-1165Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Health care services, namely providing treatment, planning and counseling for weight reduction and obesity, weight management in the nature of weight loss and/or weight maintenance programs, and weight reduction diet supervision, namely, providing adolescents with customized weight loss and weight management counseling, weight management planning and transition planning, nutritional guidance and nutrition behavior modification, all provided by telephone and the internet, and distribution of print materials related thereto | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 25, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 13, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 5, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |