USPTO serial 85752676
DESIGNATED ALE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RANNS, NATHAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DESIGNATED ALE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julia Huston
JULIA HUSTON FOLEY HOAG LLP155 SEAPORT BOULEVARDSEAPORT WESTBOSTON, MA 02210-2600Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Non-alcoholic carbonated beverages, namely, malt beverages; non-alcoholic non-carbonated beverages, namely, malt beverages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 27, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 18, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |