CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SPRITZER

USPTO serial 85755819

SPRITZER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, BRIDGETT G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPRITZER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Adam E. Schwartz

ADAM E SCHWARTZ SCHWARTZ INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW PLLC244 5TH AVE# 2157NEW YORK, NY 10001-7604

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Non-carbonated bottled drinking water, mineral water, and spring waterACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 18, 2014MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 10, 2014ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 10, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 26, 2014EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 30, 2014RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Jun 27, 2014GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2014GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2014CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
May 1, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 24, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 24, 2014EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 26, 2014GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jan 26, 2014GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jan 26, 2014CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Dec 20, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 14, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 6, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 6, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 6, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 4, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 25, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 22, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 20, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance