USPTO serial 85755910
ROYAL-T
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROYAL-T?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
North Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Grant T. Langton
Grant T. Langton Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.350 South Grand Ave., Suite 2600Two California PlazaLos Angeles, CA 90071-3406Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES; NIGHT CLUB SERVICES; MARKETING AND PROMOTIONAL SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF ENTERTAINMENT, NIGHT CLUBS, CRUISES, EVENT PRODUCTION, AND THE LIKE; ENTERTAINMENT EVENT PRODUCTION; ORGANIZING ENTERTAINMENT EXHIBITIONS IN THE FIELD OF MUSIC, LIVE PERFORMANCES, THEATRE, DRAMA, SPORTS, ARTS AND CULTURE; ELECTRONIC DEVICES, LOUDSPEAKERS, AMPLIFIERS, DIGITAL SOUND PROCESSING EQUIPMENT, HEADPHONES, COMPUTER INTERFACES FOR AUDIO; CLOTHING AND WEARING APPAREL; PRERECORDED MUSIC AND VIDEO VIA DOWNLOADS, CD, SOLID-STATE MEMORY DEVICE, AND MAGNETIC TAPE; PROVIDING WEB SITES AND INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF ENTERTAINMENT, SPECIAL EVENTS, CULTURE AND LIFESTYLE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 17, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 19, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |