Drawing for HÄLSA

USPTO serial 85756336

HÄLSA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CASTRO, GIANCARLO
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HÄLSA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brent E. Ohlmann

BRENT E. OHLMANN LAW OFFICE OF BRENT E. OHLMANN, LLC1730 PARK ST STE 210NAPERVILLE, IL 60563UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Consommes; Dried fruit mixes; Dried fruit-based snacks; Legume salads; Meatballs; Salads, namely, quinoa, edamame and tofu mixed salads; Snack mix consisting of dehydrated fruit and processed nuts; Snack mix consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts and/or raisins; Soups and preparations for making soups; Tofu; Trail mix consisting primarily of processed nuts, seeds, dried fruit and also including chocolateACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 2, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 2, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 29, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 3, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 14, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 28, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 8, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 18, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 18, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 18, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 28, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 28, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 6, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 5, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 5, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 6, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2013ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 3, 2013PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Feb 14, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 14, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 25, 2012TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Oct 25, 2012PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance