Drawing for THREE CARD WAR

USPTO serial 85756538

THREE CARD WAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with THREE CARD WAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David L. Gershner

DAVID L. GERSHNER DAVIDSON LAW FIRMPO BOX 1300LITTLE ROCK, AR 72203-1300UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Card gamesACTIVEOct 28, 2013

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 15, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 14, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 10, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2014CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2014SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jan 4, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Dec 3, 2013IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Dec 3, 2013EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jun 4, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 9, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Apr 9, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 20, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Mar 4, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 4, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 19, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 19, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Feb 19, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Feb 19, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Feb 19, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Feb 14, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 23, 2012MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Oct 22, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 20, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance