Drawing for PAYWAY

USPTO serial 85757166

PAYWAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HAN, DAWN L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PAYWAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bruce M. Landay

BRUCE M. LANDAY LANDAY LEBLANG STERN156 State Street (5th Floor)BOSTON, MA 02109-3572UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for acceptance and processing of electronic payments to and from others that may be downloaded via a global computer network or recorded on computer mediaACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 15, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 15, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 2, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 2, 2014NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED
May 1, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 1, 2014DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
May 1, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Feb 11, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 11, 2014DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Feb 11, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 11, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 11, 2014ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
Aug 13, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 18, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jun 18, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 29, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
May 14, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 11, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 19, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Apr 17, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Apr 17, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Apr 17, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Apr 17, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Apr 10, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 10, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 2, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 2, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 26, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 23, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Oct 22, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 22, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance