Drawing for EMERALD

USPTO serial 85757367

EMERALD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELL, MARLENE D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with EMERALD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL MOORE

MICHAEL MOORE MATTEL, INC.333 CONTINENTAL BLVDEL SEGUNDO, CA 90245-5032UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028TOYS, GAMES AND PLAYTHINGS, NAMELY, DOLLS, DOLL CLOTHING AND DOLL ACCESSORIESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 13, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 13, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 3, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 11, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 23, 2013CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 23, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 23, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 22, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 30, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 30, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 22, 2013CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Feb 22, 2013CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Feb 21, 2013EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Feb 16, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 23, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance