USPTO serial 85758448
GOLLA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAPTER, ALAIN J
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOLLA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. John P. Mancini
A. John P. Mancini Mayer Brown LLPP.O. Box 2828Chicago, IL 60690-2828UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Adobo; Alimentary paste (pastas and noodles); Artificial coffee; Bakery goods; Baking powder; Barbecue sauce; Biscuits; Bread; Breadcrumbs; Burritos; Candy; Capers; Cereal based snack food; Chili sauce; Chili seasoning; Chimichurri sauce; Chocolate; Cocoa; Coffee; Confectionery made of sugar; Cookies; Corn chips; Corn flour; Corn fritters; Corn meal; Corn starch; Corn-based snack foods; Crackers; Custard; Dried chili peppers; Dried corn husks for tamales; Dry seasoning mixes for Hispanic style foods; Dumplings; Edible ices; Empanada dough; Empanadas; Enchiladas; Extracts used as flavoring; Fajitas; Flan; Flavored, sweetened gelatin desserts; Flavoring syrup; Flour; Food flavorings; Food starch; Frozen confections; Grain-based chips; Grain-based food beverages; Grain-based snack foods; Hominy; Honey; Hot chili pepper sauce; Hot pepper powder; Hot sauce; Ices and ice creams; Instant pudding mixes; Ketchup; Marinade mixes; Marinades; Mayonnaise; Minced garlic; Mixes for bakery goods; Mixes for making baking batters; Mixes for making batter for hushpuppies; Mixes for making batters for fried foods; Mixes for making breading; Mustard; Natural sweetener; Noodles; Noodles and sauce mixes combined in unitary packages; Packaged meal mixes consisting primarily of pasta or rice; Pasta and noodles; Pastries; Pastry; Pastry mixes; Pastry shells; Pepper; Picante sauce; Pico de Gallo sauce; Processed garlic for use as seasoning; Puddings; Rice; Rice and seasoning mix combined in unitary packages; Rice-based snack foods; Sago; Salad dressing; Salsa; Salt; Sauces; Seasoned coating for meat, fish, poultry; Seasoned coating mixtures for foods; Seasonings; Snack cakes; Spice blends; Spice rubs; Spices; Sugar and sugar substitutes; Table syrup; Taco chips; Taco seasoning; Taco shells; Tacos; Tamales; Tapioca; Tea; Tomato sauce; Tortilla chips; Tortilla shells; Tortillas; Treacle; Vinegar; Wine vinegar; Yeast; frozen, prepared or packaged entrees consisting primarily of pasta or rice | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Beers; Bottled water; Coconut juice; Coconut milk; Coconut water; Coconut-based beverages; Corn-based beverages not for food purposes (chicha morada); Fruit beverages; Fruit drinks; Fruit juice; Fruit nectars; Fruit punch; Non-alcoholic malt beverage; Punch; Soft drinks; Syrups for making beverages; Syrups for making soft drinks; Vegetable juice; Vegetable-fruit juices; Water beverages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 12, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 14, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 12, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 23, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 2, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 29, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 10, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 5, 2016 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2016 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 16, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 27, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 22, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 16, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 7, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 5, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 4, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |