USPTO serial 85758912
PATIENT SPECIFIC IMMERSION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PATIENT SPECIFIC IMMERSION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine S. Collins
CATHERINE S COLLINS WARNER NORCROSS & JUDD LLP111 LYON ST NW STE 900GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49503-2487UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Patient supports for medical use, namely, mattresses and components therefor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 11, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 26, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |