USPTO serial 85759335
AUTENTICO CHEESE SOCIETY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARK, JENNY K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AUTENTICO CHEESE SOCIETY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
City of Industry, CA
Monrovia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Antonio de Cardenas
800 Royal Oaks DriveSuite 200Monrovia, CA 91016Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Chorizo; Sausages; Dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; veined blue cheeses and roquefort cheese | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 30, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2018 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jun 13, 2018 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2017 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2017 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 20, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 21, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 19, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 7, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 19, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 10, 2015 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 16, 2015 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 29, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2015 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 27, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 5, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 7, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 4, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |