Drawing for BE ENLIGHTENED

USPTO serial 85760343

BE ENLIGHTENED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ORNDORFF, LINDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BE ENLIGHTENED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Bevilacqua, Esquire

Michael J. Bevilacqua, Esquire Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and DorrLLP60 State StreetBoston, MA 02109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for project management, project collaboration, data storage, creation of graphs and charts, knowledge management, creation, curation and analysis of organizational data, and for tracking, reporting, and assessing employee performance; computer application software for mobile phones, PDAs, portable media players, handheld computers, and tablets for project management, project collaboration, data storage, creation of graphs and charts, knowledge management, creation, curation and analysis of organizational data, and for tracking, reporting, and assessing employee performanceACTIVE—
042software as a service (SAAS) for project management, project collaboration, data storage, creation of graphs and charts, knowledge management, creation, curation and analysis of organizational data, and for tracking, reporting, and assessing employee performanceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 18, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 5, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 17, 2015EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 17, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 17, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 17, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 17, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 14, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 12, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 17, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 17, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 19, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 17, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 17, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 12, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 2, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 2, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 22, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 2, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 13, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 4, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 20, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 19, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 19, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 25, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance