Drawing for POUR LA VICTOIRE

USPTO serial 85760474

POUR LA VICTOIRE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HACK, ANDREA R
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POUR LA VICTOIRE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Garner K. Weng

Garner K. Weng Hanson Bridgett LLP425 Market Street, 26th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Brooches; Jewelry, watches, jewelry boxes, jewelry cases; jewelry casketsACTIVE—
018Backpacks, suitcases, book bags, fanny packsACTIVE—
025Bathing suits; belts; caps; coats; dresses; hats; insoles; jackets, trousers, vests, pants; shirts; skirts; socks; suits; ties; tops; underwearACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 24, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 24, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 10, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2017EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 14, 2016EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 14, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 1, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 29, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 17, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 17, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 21, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 20, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 17, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 17, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 17, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 15, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 17, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 17, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 13, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 13, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 13, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 11, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 11, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 17, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 6, 2014ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Nov 21, 2013ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 2, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 13, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 4, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 19, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 19, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 19, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2013GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 21, 2013GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 21, 2013CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 20, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 2012MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Oct 26, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance