Drawing for SMARTWITNESS

USPTO serial 85762129

SMARTWITNESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMARTWITNESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John M. Kim

JOHN M KIM IP LEGAL ADVISORS PC4445 EASTGATE MALLSTE 200SAN DIEGO, CA 92121-1979

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Vehicle mounted cameras to record audio and video footage of vehicular accidentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 21, 2015MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 20, 2015ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 20, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 8, 2015EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 23, 2015GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2015GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2015CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 10, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 3, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 28, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 28, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 28, 2014EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 27, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 27, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 27, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 1, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 25, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 3, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 1, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance