Drawing for THE EPIC SEED

USPTO serial 85762427

THE EPIC SEED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BODRI, JOHN PETER
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE EPIC SEED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David J. Marr

David J. Marr Clark Hill PLC150 North Michigan Avenue, Suite 2700Chicago, IL 60601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029yogurt, strained yogurt, and probiotic yogurt-based beverages not for medical purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 27, 2016MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 19, 2016ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 19, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 1, 2016RGTRREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - TTAB REQUEST—
Jun 1, 2016MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 31, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 23, 2016ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 23, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 8, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 8, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2016EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 7, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 7, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2015RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Feb 12, 2015CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 11, 2015CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jan 23, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 23, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 27, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 27, 2014EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 28, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 27, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 5, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 4, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 4, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 4, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 4, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 20, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2012MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Oct 30, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance