Drawing for ROO

USPTO serial 85762499

ROO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REEVES, APRIL ELIZABETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rupen R. Fofaria

Rupen R. Fofaria Cranfill, Sumner & Hartzog, LLP5420 Wade Park BoulevardSuite 300Raleigh, NC 27607

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Plastic beverage wareACTIVE—
029Snacks foods, namely, potato chips; trail mixes consisting primarily of processed nuts, seeds, dried fruit and including chocolate; processed nuts; nut based snack barsACTIVE—
030Snack foods, namely, popcorn, pretzels, cookies, crackers, corn chips, and snack mixes consisting primarily of crackers, pretzels, popcorn, candy and chocolate; granola-based snack bars; candy; chewing gum; coffee; hot chocolate; hot dog sandwiches; ice; ice creams; sandwiches; and teaACTIVE—
032Bottled water; energy drinks; fruit juices and fruit drinks; soft drinksACTIVE—
035Retail store services featuring convenience store items, coffee and related items, and gasoline; self-service coffee and non-alcoholic beverage store servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 25, 2015EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jun 22, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 22, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 8, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 8, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 30, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 29, 2014TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 29, 2014PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 29, 2014PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 22, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 19, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 5, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 4, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 4, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 12, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 12, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 26, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 26, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 24, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 4, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 16, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 8, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 26, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 24, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 22, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 30, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance