Drawing for CEILING FAN CITY

USPTO serial 85762869

CEILING FAN CITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YAO, GRETTA
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CEILING FAN CITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher J. Day

CHRISTOPHER J DAY LAW OFFICE OF CHRISTOPHER DAY9977 NORTH 90TH STREETSUITE 155SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85258

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035On-line retail store services featuring ceiling fans, paddle fans, ventilation fans, table fans, oscillating fans, and wall fansABANDONEDOct 1, 2012

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 8, 2013MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Nov 8, 2013ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Nov 8, 2013OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 8, 2013OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jul 24, 2013OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 28, 2013ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 28, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 28, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 8, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 24, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 9, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 2, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 2, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 22, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 31, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance