USPTO serial 85762911
SALAD MATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SALAD MATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joe McKinney Muncy
JOE MCKINNEY MUNCY MUNCY, GEISSLER, OLDS & LOWE, PLLC4000 LEGATO RD STE 310FAIRFAX, VA 22033-2898UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, fish, poultry and game preserves; Meat extracts; Preserved, dried and cooked fruit and vegetables; Jellies and jams; Compotes; Meat, fruit and vegetable jellies, jams; Egg product; Milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; Edible oils and fats; Dried seafood in powder form; Dried edible seaweed (hoshi-wakame); Processed, edible seaweed; Vegetable paste; Laver; Dried flakes of laver for sprinkling on rice in hot water (ochazuke-nori); Blocks of boiled, smoked and then dried bonitos (katsuo-bushi); Soups; Soups and preparations for making soups; Bouillon concentrates; Bouillon; Extracts for soups; Instant or pre-cooked miso soup; Instant or pre-cooked soup; Flakes of dried fish meat (kezuri-bushi); Fish and chips; Shrimp chips; Vegetable chips; Processed edible seeds; Bean curd; Tofu | ACTIVE | Sep 22, 2012 |
| 030 | Coffee and tea; Artificial coffee and tea; Cocoa; Sugar; Honey and treacle; Biscuits; Bread; Cakes; Candy; Confectioneries, namely, snack foods, namely, chocolate; Puddings; Ice; Rice; Rice, seasonings, and flavorings combined in unitary packages; Rice and seasoning mix combined in unitary packages; Seasoned rice cakes with fish, meat, chicken and vegetable toppings; Corn starch based drink, in the nature of a food beverage consisting primarily of maize and porridge; Instant noodles; Noodles; Rice noodles; Noodles, seasonings, edible oil, and dehydrated vegetables combined in unitary packages; Bean-starch noodles and seasoning mixes combined in unitary packages; Rice noodles and seasoning mixes combined in unitary packages; Packaged meal mixes consisting primarily of pasta or rice; Seasoned coating for meat, fish, poultry; Seasoned coating mixtures for foods; Seasoning mixes; Seasoning mixes for soups; Processed oats; Processed cereals; Cooking salt; Cooking sauces; Condiments, namely, fish sauce, mushroom sauce, oyster sauce, pepper spice and shrimp sauce; Curry; Curry powder (spice); Curry pastes; Curry sauce; Miso bean paste; Mustard; Pepper; Relish; Roasted and ground sesame seeds; Sauces; Sauce mixes; Soy sauce; Soy bean paste; Spices; Seasonings; Seasoning pastes; Seasonings, namely, furikake consisting primarily of mixtures of roasted sesame, laver, seaweed, dried vegetables, dried seafood, preserved fish, preserved shrimp and spices; Monosodium glutamate used as a flavor enhancer for food; Tapioca; Flour for food; Sago; Yeast, baking powder and flavourings; Seasoning mixes for soups | ACTIVE | Sep 22, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 16, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 16, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 14, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |